SPECIAL REPORT: "Tortured Logic: McGovern talks about Gina Haspel, the new CIA director"

The Resistance Round Table panel interviews former CIA analyst Ray McGovern about Gina Haspel, the new CIA director who oversaw torture after 9/11. The conversation includes discussion of the U.S. as an 'out law state,' American exceptionalism and the fight to defend net neutrality. Panel: Scott Harris, Ruthanne Baumgartner and Richard Hill (49:08) May 23, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "MIT Students' 'Day of Action': Understanding and Resisting Attacks on Immigrants"

Three-part excerpts from Avi Chomsky's presentations at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Day of Action on April 17. Includes a historical perspective as well as a question and answer session with immigrants. Recorded and produced by Chuck Rosina, long-time public affairs and news producer at WMBR FM, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's radio station in Cambridge, Massachusetts. April 17, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "MIT Students' 'Day of Action' Takes On Today's Political, Economic Challenges"

Chuck Rosina's report on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Day of Action on April 17, where members of the MIT and broader local community were given an opportunity to devote the day to engaging with the political, economic, environmental and social challenges facing us today, through learning, discussion, reflection and planning for action. Includes comments from Avi Chomsky, daughter of the renowned professor Noam Chomsky (12:58) April 17, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "Response to chemical attack in Syria – The priority must be the people"

The Resistance Roundtable panel discusses the U.S. missile strikes on Damascus and interviews Stan Heller from Promoting Enduring Peace ( the situation in Syria and the broader Middle East. Panel: Ruthanne Baumgartner, Scott Harris and Richard Hill. April 14, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "What's next for the youth movement against gun violence?"

Tyler Suarez, lead organizer of the March for Our Lives demo in Hartford, CT on March 24, assesses the event attended by 10,000 and discusses the agenda for the youth movement going forward. Interviewed by Richard Hill.

SPECIAL REPORT: "March for Our Lives - Hartford, Connecticut" March 24, 2018

Selected speeches from the March for Our Lives in Hartford, Connecticut, recorded and produced by Scott Harris

Panel Discussion: Privatization v. Public Good and the Upcoming March for Our Lives on March 24

SPECIAL REPORT: Organized Labor: Resurgent or On the Ropes?

SPECIAL REPORT: Neoliberalism Comes Home: Connecticut's Water Under Privatization Threat

SPECIAL REPORT: Can There Be Food Justice Under Capitalism?

SPECIAL REPORT: Resistance Round Table – Feb. 10, 2018

Award-winning Investigative Journalist Robert Parry (1949-2018)

Award-winning investigative journalist and founder/editor of, Robert Parry has passed away. His ground-breaking work uncovering Reagan-era dirty wars in Central America and many other illegal and immoral policies conducted by successive administrations and U.S. intelligence agencies, stands as an inspiration to all in journalists working in the public interest.

Robert had been a regular guest on our Between The Lines and Counterpoint radio shows -- and many other progressive outlets across the U.S. over four decades.

His penetrating analysis of U.S. foreign policy and international conflicts will be sorely missed, and not easily replaced. His son Nat Parry writes a tribute to his father: Robert Parry’s Legacy and the Future of Consortiumnews.

Thank you for donating

If you've made a donation and wish to receive thank you gifts for your donation, be sure to send us your mailing address via our Contact form.

See our thank you gifts for your donation.

The Resistance Starts Now!

Between The Lines' coverage and resource compilation of the Resistance Movement

SPECIAL REPORT: "The Resistance - Women's March 2018 - Hartford, Connecticut" Jan. 20, 2018

Selected speeches from the Women's March in Hartford, Connecticut 2018, recorded and produced by Scott Harris

SPECIAL REPORT: "No Fracking Waste in CT!" Jan. 14, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "Resistance Round Table: The Unraveling Continues..." Jan. 13, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "Capitalism to the ash heap?" Richard Wolff, Jan. 2, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: Maryn McKenna, author of "Big Chicken", Dec. 7, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Nina Turner's address, Working Families Party Awards Banquet, Dec. 14, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Mic Check, Dec. 12, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Resistance Roundtable, Dec. 9, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: On Tyranny - one year later, Nov. 28, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Mic Check, Nov. 12, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Resistance Roundtable, Nov. 11, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Rainy Day Radio, Nov. 7, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Rainy Day Radio, Nov. 7, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Resisting U.S. JeJu Island military base in South Korea, Oct. 24, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: John Allen, Out in New Haven

2017 Gandhi Peace Awards

Promoting Enduring Peace presented its Gandhi Peace Award jointly to renowned consumer advocate Ralph Nader and BDS founder Omar Barghouti on April 23, 2017.

Subscribe to our Weekly Summary & receive our FREE Resist Trump window cling

resist (Car window cling)

Email us with your mailing address at to receive our "Resist Trump/Resist Hate" car window cling!


who helped make our 25th anniversary with Jeremy Scahill a success!

For those who missed the event, or were there and really wanted to fully absorb its import, here it is in video

Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 1 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.

Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 2 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.

Between The Lines on Stitcher


Between The Lines Presentation at the Left Forum 2016

"How Do We Build A Mass Movement to Reverse Runaway Inequality?" with Les Leopold, author of "Runaway Inequality: An Activist's Guide to Economic Justice,"May 22, 2016, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York, 860 11th Ave. (Between 58th and 59th), New York City. Between The Lines' Scott Harris and Richard Hill moderated this workshop. Listen to the audio/slideshows and more from this workshop.

Listen to audio of the plenary sessions from the weekend.

JEREMY SCAHILL: Oscar-nominated documentary filmmaker "Dirty Wars"

Listen to the full interview (30:33) with Jeremy Scahill, an award-winning investigative journalist with the Nation Magazine, correspondent for Democracy Now! and author of the bestselling book, "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army," about America's outsourcing of its military. In an exclusive interview with Counterpoint's Scott Harris on Sept. 16, 2013, Scahill talks about his latest book, "Dirty Wars, The World is a Battlefield," also made into a documentary film under the same title, and was nominated Dec. 5, 2013 for an Academy Award in the Best Documentary Feature category.

Listen to Scott Harris Live on WPKN Radio

Between The Lines' Executive Producer Scott Harris hosts a live, weekly talk show, Counterpoint, from which some of Between The Lines' interviews are excerpted. Listen every Monday evening from 8 to 10 p.m. EDT at (Follows the 5-7 minute White Rose Calendar.)

Counterpoint in its entirety is archived after midnight ET Monday nights, and is available for at least a year following broadcast in WPKN Radio's Archives.

You can also listen to full unedited interview segments from Counterpoint, which are generally available some time the day following broadcast.

Subscribe to Counterpoint bulletins via our subscriptions page.

Between The Lines Blog  BTL Blog

"The Rogue World Order: Connecting the Dots Between Trump, Flynn, Bannon, Spencer, Dugin Putin," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Feb. 13, 2017

"Widespread Resistance Begins to Trump's Muslim Travel Ban at U.S. Airports," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 28, 2017

"MSNBC Editor: Women's March is a Revival of the Progressive Movement," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 24, 2017

"Cornering Trump," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 19, 2017

"Free Leonard Peltier," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 6, 2016

"For Natives, a "Day of Mourning"by Reginald Johnson, November 23, 2016

"A Bitter Harvest" by Reginald Johnson, Nov. 15, 2016

Special Programming Special Programming

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Between The Lines Progressive Resources

A compilation of activist and news sites with a progressive point of view

Share this content:


Podcasts Subscribe to BTL

Podcasts:  direct  or  via iTunes

Subscribe to Program Summaries, Interview Transcripts or Counterpoint via email or RSS feed

If you have other questions regarding subscriptions, feeds or podcasts/mp3s go to our Audio Help page.

Between The Lines Blog

Stay connected to BTL

RSS feed  twitter  facebook

donate  Learn how to support our efforts!

Reproductive Rights Advocates Hopeful Supreme Court Will Overturn Restrictive Texas Abortion Law

Posted March 9, 2016

MP3 Interview with Gretchen Borchelt, vice president of reproductive rights and health of the National Women's Law Center, conducted by Melinda Tuhus


The Texas law passed in 2013 that has severely restricted women’s access to abortion was appealed and reached the Supreme Court this term, where both sides argued their case on March 2. The law required doctors performing abortions to be given admitting privileges at local hospitals and required abortion clinics to meet the standards of ambulatory surgical centers. Similar laws have passed in many other states. Supporters of these laws maintain that they were implemented to protect women's health. But women's health providers and advocates say such laws have had the opposite effect by denying women constitutionally protected health care. The high court’s ruling in the Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt case could come any time up through the end of the Court's term this June.

In 2012, Texas had 41 abortion clinics open, serving most of the state. Now Texas has only 19 operating clinics, and that number would be reduced to 9 if the restrictive abortion law takes effect. By implementing these so-called Targeted Regulation Of Abortion Providers or TRAP laws, Republican governors and legislatures across the U.S. have succeeded in eroding abortion rights over the past several years.

Between The Lines’ Melinda Tuhus spoke with Gretchen Borchelt, vice president for reproductive rights and health at the National Women's Law Center. Here, she explains why this case is considered the most important for reproductive health in a generation – and what ruling she expects from the Supreme Court after it lost its most conservative member, Antonin Scalia, died in February.

GRETCHEN BORCHELT: The question that’s at issue in this case, that’s before the Court right now, is how far states can go in their attempts to make it difficult or even impossible for women to exercise that constitutional right to abortion. We know for over 40 years the Supreme Court has made it clear that women have a Constitutionally protected right to decide whether to entertain an abortion. The last major case was on that decision was in 1992: Planned Parenthood versus Casey. And the Supreme Court said states can’t pass laws that impose an undue burden on that right. Since that decision in 1992, we’ve seen state lawmakers try to make an end run around those protections and advance laws that are really meant to shut down clinics and make it impossible for women to get the essential reproductive health care they need. And that’s what’s at stake here: What is that standard that the Court put in place in 1992? The undue burden: What does that mean for women? What constitutes an undue burden? This is really the Court’s first major wrestling with that question since it set the standard into place.

BETWEEN THE LINES: The Supreme Court just issued a stay against the enforcement of a similar law in Louisiana, which would have reduced the number of abortion facilities in the state from four to just one. I guess that’s at least a temporary victory for women.

GRETCHEN BORCHELT: So, in Louisiana they passed a requirement for admitting privileges, which is one of the restrictions at issue in the Texas case. And the Supreme Court stepped in to hold that law so that it doesn’t go into effect. If that law had gone into effect in Louisiana, it would have left that state with one abortion clinic, so one clinic for the entire state of Louisiana. So the Supreme Court stepped in and said, we’re going to hold that law. It won’t go into effect while these other lawsuits proceed. So it’s certainly a victory for women in Louisiana. It doesn’t tell us much about the way they’ll come out in Texas, necessarily, because those kinds of stay orders don’t have an entire written decision; you don’t really know what the justices are thinking. But it shows that these kinds of restrictions are passing across the country; it’s not just in Texas. We’ve seen them in Louisiana, in Mississippi, in Wisconsin. Across the country, these state lawmakers are quietly passing these abortion restrictions. There have been 288 abortion restrictions passed in the last five years. And a lot of them are closing clinics, and they’re aimed at closing clinics. But other ones are just bad for women – trying to prevent women from getting an abortion, lying to women, delaying women, making abortion cost more than it should – these kinds of restrictions are passing and we really need the Supreme Court to step in here and put an end to it.

BETWEEN THE LINES: We talked about this a couple of years ago, when the Texas law was first passed. The biggest difference now is that there are eight members on the Supreme Court instead of nine. Justice Antonin Scalia, who died recently, would clearly have been on the side of the Texas law in further restricting abortion rights. So now, with Justice Anthony Kennedy always seeming to be the swing vote, it looks like it will either be a 4-4 tie or the justices will come down against the Texas law. Can you elaborate on those two scenarios?

GRETCHEN BORCHELT: Sure. I mean, first of all, I want to say we’re confident that the Supreme Court is going to strike down these laws. As I said, it’s long been the case that the Supreme Court has affirmed that the U.S. Constitution protects a woman’s right to abortion, and they have this undue burden standard. And given what is happening in Texas, with all these clinics shutting down, women being forced to travel 500 miles to get an abortion, not being able to access abortion at all; it’s clear that this is an undue burden, so we’re confident in a 5-3 decision. Even with the absence of Justice Scalia, I think we have a victory here. If the court were to tie with a 4-4 decision, that would mean that the lower court’s decision would stand, which in Texas is a terrible decision. Clinics would close; women would lose their ability to access abortion in this country. I don’t think that that’s a result that the Court can really approve of. And it also would mean that these other cases that are pending, like in Louisiana, like in Mississippi, would still be working their way up to the Court, and the Court is going to have to resolve this question once and for all, eventually.

BETWEEN THE LINES: I was looking at data from the Guttmacher Institute about abortion trends. From 1973 to 2011, which was the most recent year for data, abortions hit a high of 1.6 million nationally in 1988 and there's been significant drop between 2008 and 2011, which the Institute attributes to what it calls a "steep drop in unintended pregnancy, which in turn is most plausibly explained by more and better contraceptive use," and not to all the anti-abortion laws being passed which mostly went into effect after 2011. But access to birth control is also under assault, isn't it?

GRETCHEN BORCHELT: This isn’t the only case about reproductive health that’s before the Court this term. There’s another case that the Supreme Court is reviewing that’s about access to birth control, and whether employers can step in and prevent women from accessing birth control. We’re seeing these kinds of efforts to interfere in a woman’s decision making, whether it’s abortion or birth control, by third parties who should not be involved. Politicians shouldn’t have a role in deciding whether women can access abortion, and your boss shouldn’t have a role in deciding whether or not you use birth control. So, again, we’re confident that the Supreme Court is going to step forward in both these cases and put an end to interference in women’s decision making.

Learn more about the Texas anti-abortion law and the groups working to protect a woman’s reproductive rights by visiting

Related Links: