SPECIAL REPORT: "Tortured Logic: McGovern talks about Gina Haspel, the new CIA director"

The Resistance Round Table panel interviews former CIA analyst Ray McGovern about Gina Haspel, the new CIA director who oversaw torture after 9/11. The conversation includes discussion of the U.S. as an 'out law state,' American exceptionalism and the fight to defend net neutrality. Panel: Scott Harris, Ruthanne Baumgartner and Richard Hill (49:08) May 23, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "MIT Students' 'Day of Action': Understanding and Resisting Attacks on Immigrants"

Three-part excerpts from Avi Chomsky's presentations at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Day of Action on April 17. Includes a historical perspective as well as a question and answer session with immigrants. Recorded and produced by Chuck Rosina, long-time public affairs and news producer at WMBR FM, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's radio station in Cambridge, Massachusetts. April 17, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "MIT Students' 'Day of Action' Takes On Today's Political, Economic Challenges"

Chuck Rosina's report on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Day of Action on April 17, where members of the MIT and broader local community were given an opportunity to devote the day to engaging with the political, economic, environmental and social challenges facing us today, through learning, discussion, reflection and planning for action. Includes comments from Avi Chomsky, daughter of the renowned professor Noam Chomsky (12:58) April 17, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "Response to chemical attack in Syria – The priority must be the people"

The Resistance Roundtable panel discusses the U.S. missile strikes on Damascus and interviews Stan Heller from Promoting Enduring Peace ( the situation in Syria and the broader Middle East. Panel: Ruthanne Baumgartner, Scott Harris and Richard Hill. April 14, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "What's next for the youth movement against gun violence?"

Tyler Suarez, lead organizer of the March for Our Lives demo in Hartford, CT on March 24, assesses the event attended by 10,000 and discusses the agenda for the youth movement going forward. Interviewed by Richard Hill.

SPECIAL REPORT: "March for Our Lives - Hartford, Connecticut" March 24, 2018

Selected speeches from the March for Our Lives in Hartford, Connecticut, recorded and produced by Scott Harris

Panel Discussion: Privatization v. Public Good and the Upcoming March for Our Lives on March 24

SPECIAL REPORT: Organized Labor: Resurgent or On the Ropes?

SPECIAL REPORT: Neoliberalism Comes Home: Connecticut's Water Under Privatization Threat

SPECIAL REPORT: Can There Be Food Justice Under Capitalism?

SPECIAL REPORT: Resistance Round Table – Feb. 10, 2018

Award-winning Investigative Journalist Robert Parry (1949-2018)

Award-winning investigative journalist and founder/editor of, Robert Parry has passed away. His ground-breaking work uncovering Reagan-era dirty wars in Central America and many other illegal and immoral policies conducted by successive administrations and U.S. intelligence agencies, stands as an inspiration to all in journalists working in the public interest.

Robert had been a regular guest on our Between The Lines and Counterpoint radio shows -- and many other progressive outlets across the U.S. over four decades.

His penetrating analysis of U.S. foreign policy and international conflicts will be sorely missed, and not easily replaced. His son Nat Parry writes a tribute to his father: Robert Parry’s Legacy and the Future of Consortiumnews.

Thank you for donating

If you've made a donation and wish to receive thank you gifts for your donation, be sure to send us your mailing address via our Contact form.

See our thank you gifts for your donation.

The Resistance Starts Now!

Between The Lines' coverage and resource compilation of the Resistance Movement

SPECIAL REPORT: "The Resistance - Women's March 2018 - Hartford, Connecticut" Jan. 20, 2018

Selected speeches from the Women's March in Hartford, Connecticut 2018, recorded and produced by Scott Harris

SPECIAL REPORT: "No Fracking Waste in CT!" Jan. 14, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "Resistance Round Table: The Unraveling Continues..." Jan. 13, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: "Capitalism to the ash heap?" Richard Wolff, Jan. 2, 2018

SPECIAL REPORT: Maryn McKenna, author of "Big Chicken", Dec. 7, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Nina Turner's address, Working Families Party Awards Banquet, Dec. 14, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Mic Check, Dec. 12, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Resistance Roundtable, Dec. 9, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: On Tyranny - one year later, Nov. 28, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Mic Check, Nov. 12, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Resistance Roundtable, Nov. 11, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Rainy Day Radio, Nov. 7, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Rainy Day Radio, Nov. 7, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: Resisting U.S. JeJu Island military base in South Korea, Oct. 24, 2017

SPECIAL REPORT: John Allen, Out in New Haven

2017 Gandhi Peace Awards

Promoting Enduring Peace presented its Gandhi Peace Award jointly to renowned consumer advocate Ralph Nader and BDS founder Omar Barghouti on April 23, 2017.

Subscribe to our Weekly Summary & receive our FREE Resist Trump window cling

resist (Car window cling)

Email us with your mailing address at to receive our "Resist Trump/Resist Hate" car window cling!


who helped make our 25th anniversary with Jeremy Scahill a success!

For those who missed the event, or were there and really wanted to fully absorb its import, here it is in video

Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 1 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.

Jeremy Scahill keynote speech, part 2 from PROUDEYEMEDIA on Vimeo.

Between The Lines on Stitcher


Between The Lines Presentation at the Left Forum 2016

"How Do We Build A Mass Movement to Reverse Runaway Inequality?" with Les Leopold, author of "Runaway Inequality: An Activist's Guide to Economic Justice,"May 22, 2016, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York, 860 11th Ave. (Between 58th and 59th), New York City. Between The Lines' Scott Harris and Richard Hill moderated this workshop. Listen to the audio/slideshows and more from this workshop.

Listen to audio of the plenary sessions from the weekend.

JEREMY SCAHILL: Oscar-nominated documentary filmmaker "Dirty Wars"

Listen to the full interview (30:33) with Jeremy Scahill, an award-winning investigative journalist with the Nation Magazine, correspondent for Democracy Now! and author of the bestselling book, "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army," about America's outsourcing of its military. In an exclusive interview with Counterpoint's Scott Harris on Sept. 16, 2013, Scahill talks about his latest book, "Dirty Wars, The World is a Battlefield," also made into a documentary film under the same title, and was nominated Dec. 5, 2013 for an Academy Award in the Best Documentary Feature category.

Listen to Scott Harris Live on WPKN Radio

Between The Lines' Executive Producer Scott Harris hosts a live, weekly talk show, Counterpoint, from which some of Between The Lines' interviews are excerpted. Listen every Monday evening from 8 to 10 p.m. EDT at (Follows the 5-7 minute White Rose Calendar.)

Counterpoint in its entirety is archived after midnight ET Monday nights, and is available for at least a year following broadcast in WPKN Radio's Archives.

You can also listen to full unedited interview segments from Counterpoint, which are generally available some time the day following broadcast.

Subscribe to Counterpoint bulletins via our subscriptions page.

Between The Lines Blog  BTL Blog

"The Rogue World Order: Connecting the Dots Between Trump, Flynn, Bannon, Spencer, Dugin Putin," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Feb. 13, 2017

"Widespread Resistance Begins to Trump's Muslim Travel Ban at U.S. Airports," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 28, 2017

"MSNBC Editor: Women's March is a Revival of the Progressive Movement," by Anna Manzo (GlobalHealing), Daily Kos, Jan. 24, 2017

"Cornering Trump," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 19, 2017

"Free Leonard Peltier," by Reginald Johnson, Jan. 6, 2016

"For Natives, a "Day of Mourning"by Reginald Johnson, November 23, 2016

"A Bitter Harvest" by Reginald Johnson, Nov. 15, 2016

Special Programming Special Programming

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Between The Lines Progressive Resources

A compilation of activist and news sites with a progressive point of view

Share this content:


Podcasts Subscribe to BTL

Podcasts:  direct  or  via iTunes

Subscribe to Program Summaries, Interview Transcripts or Counterpoint via email or RSS feed

If you have other questions regarding subscriptions, feeds or podcasts/mp3s go to our Audio Help page.

Between The Lines Blog

Stay connected to BTL

RSS feed  twitter  facebook

donate  Learn how to support our efforts!

Environmentalists: Obama Administration Carbon Regulations Don't Go Far Enough

Posted June 11, 2014

MP3 Interview with Mitch Jones, common resources director with Food & Water Watch, conducted by Scott Harris. Transcript compiled by Evan Bieder.


On June 2, the Obama administration announced new Environmental Protection Agency standards to regulate power plant carbon emissions. The rules, which are being proposed to fight climate change, were designed to reduce carbon pollution from the nation’s power plant 30 percent from 2005 levels by the year 2030. The new regulations target greenhouse gas emissions produced by the nation’s 600 coal-fired power plants, the largest source of carbon dioxide in the U.S.

According to scientific observers, the new regulation would enable the U.S. to reach its goal – set during the 2009 UN Conference Framework Convention on Climate Change in Copenhagen – to reduce the nation’s carbon emissions by 17 percent from 2005 levels by the year 2020, and 83 percent by the year 2050.

The coal industry and their conservative allies in Congress hope to derail the new EPA rules through legislative and legal challenges. These opponents claim the new carbon regulations will raise electric rates, damage the economy and export jobs to China. But while environmental groups have welcomed the new rules, many complain that the president did not go far enough, given the scale of the planet’s climate emergency. Between The Lines’ Scott Harris spoke with Mitch Jones, Common Resources director with Food & Water Watch, who explains why many environmental activist groups are critical of the new regulations for not being as aggressive as they need to be.

MITCH JONES: We are glad that the president decided to return his focus to climate change. You know, it’s kind of been missing in the national debate for the past five years or so and was missing from the presidential campaign two years ago, so we’re happy that the president has proposed a rule and brought the issue back to the fore, but we are disappointed, and a lot of our friends and allies are disappointed that the rule isn’t as far-reaching as we had hoped. It’s not as ambitious as we had hoped. It’s not taking the lead in a way that we had really hoped. And, Food and Water Watch and another organization called the Institute for Policy Studies issued a joint statement a week ago when the rule was released highlighting a variety of our concerns with the rule beginning with that target with 30 percent from 2005 by 2030. We don’t believe, and I believe a lot of other organizations agree with us, that’s not a target that is really ambitious enough to get the sort of change that we need in order to really combat climate change.

BETWEEN THE LINES: Your organization has said that a switch from coal fire-powered plants to electric power plants that are fueled by natural gas really is not the answer, and that seems to be the direction the administration and a lot of utilities are going to, mostly based on price these days, but maybe you could speak about how natural gas really is not a good switch over when it comes to climate change.

MITCH JONES: Sure, so, when the rule was originally released, everybody was saying this is going to be a real boon for wind and solar because what we’re going to replace coal with is wind and solar, but, as you indicated, when you look at price, when you look at market forces that are going to be at play here because this is a market-driven rule, gas is going to be the real beneficiary of the rule and the reason why we think that’s bad is because if you compare burning gas to burning coal, hands down, gas is cleaner when you’re actually burning it. It’s much cleaner, you know, but if you consider the whole life-cycle from when it’s extracted to when it’s burned, that advantage to coal over gas basically disappears, and the evidence for this is becoming stronger as we go on. So, for instance, new calculations being done by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which is the big, international group that has been issuing reports now for decades about climate change, demonstrating that there is a scientific consensus about human-caused climate change, that there is a real need to do something drastic if we’re going to avoid a climate change that we as human beings just can’t survive. They now claim that on a 20-year timeframe, a pound of methane will trap about 86 times as much heat as a pound of carbon. So, you know, that’s a new number, that’s been revised up so that in a 20-year timeframe, methane is 86 times more potent as a greenhouse gas than carbon. Now, I should point out that when writing this rule, the EPA didn’t use the 20-year timeframe, they used the 100-year timeframe in which methane isn’t quite as bad, it’s only 34 times as potent as coal, but that’s another point in which we have a problem. We don’t think they should have used the 100-year timeframe. You know, quite frankly, we don’t have 100 years to get this problem fixed. So, we need to focus on that shorter timeframe, that 20-year timeframe. Those are the reasons why we think that switching to natural gas is not going to get you the real savings on greenhouse gasses on climate change that the rule is assuming will be there.

BETWEEN THE LINES: In our debate here in the United States, there are people on the right who don’t believe in climate change anyway. Many climate change deniers are opposed to these regulations and many people who even give some credence to those scientific studies talking about climate change are crucial of this plan thinking that it’s government overreach, that it will trigger higher electric rates, and hurt the U.S. economy overall. Maybe you could speak directly to these critiques of hurting the economy.

MITCH JONES: The Chamber of Commerce did its own study about this and they released it right before the rule was released and what it really found was a small, I believe it was 0.2 percent, effect on GDP. Even by their own study that they were putting out as part of their scare-mongering techniques about the economic effects of the rule, what they found was a very small effect. I mean, I don’t want to say that there isn’t going to be an economic effect by reducing carbon and fighting climate change. There will be, but it’s not going to be the devastating, job-killer that, you know, the oil and gas industry and the Koch brothers want us to believe that it would actually be. And, if the government were to really couple a robust rule, something much stronger than the rule that’s being proposed with a renewed commitment to investing in wind and solar, we have a real opportunity to build a new, stronger economy built upon not only providing renewable and sustainable energy, but using renewable and sustainable energy. And so, if we invest wisely, if we put the investments in the right places, and if we focus on the right things, we can really mitigate a lot of that economic effect but what we can’t do is wait any longer to fight climate change. We just … we’re running out of time. We have to do something now and we have to do something much bolder than what this rule suggests.

For more information on Food & Water Watch, visit

Related Links: