Selected Between The Lines Radio Newsmagazine audio recordings from: The International Forum on Globalization's conference, Oct. 25, 2014, Cooper Union, New York City
Listen to Ralph Nader's 75 min. talk and interview about his new book, "Unstoppable: The Emerging Left-Right Alliance to Dismantle the Corporate State" at Barnes and Noble, Milford, Connecticut. Nader makes a compelling case for left-right alliances on majoritarian issues that progressives and conservatives agree on, acknowledging that individuals feel all too often that they are powerless against the big power structure. He notes that issues such as school prayer, reproductive rights and gun control are issues that the power structure depends on to keep the majority divided. The minimum wage, breaking up the big banks, Pentagon audits, health care, campaign finance reform, corporate tax inversions, Net Neutrality, fracking and GMOs are just a few examples of left-right issues discussed with the audience. He says just a fraction of the left and right – working together – can make a huge "unstoppable" political realignment in passing legislation, despite the "ick factor" of working with those whose other views they don't always agree with.
Listen to Ralph Nader's short interview on current events with Scott Harris before the booksigning.
Audio recordings from the Left Forum here.
Please note that this site is best viewed through Firefox 3.0, Safari 1.0, Opera 6.0, Netscape 6.0, Internet Explorer 8, Chrome 1.0, or more recent versions of any of these browsers. Please send any comments via our Contact form.
Please select the "Current Broadcast MP3" item under the "For Stations" button in the navigation bar above.
Read a partial interview transcript with Pete Seeger conducted by Between The Lines' Scott Harris on June 5, 1994 and published in E: The Environmental Magazine in December 1994
Listen to the entire 30-minute interview here.
Listen to the full interview (30:33) with Jeremy Scahill, an award-winning investigative journalist with the Nation Magazine, correspondent for Democracy Now! and author of the bestselling book, "Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army," about America's outsourcing of its military. In an exclusive interview with Counterpoint's Scott Harris on Sept. 16, 2013, Scahill talks about his latest book, "Dirty Wars, The World is a Battlefield," also made into a documentary film under the same title, and was nominated Dec. 5, 2013 for an Academy Award in the Best Documentary Feature category.
Bill McKibben, Schumann Distinguished Scholar at Middlebury College and author of a dozen books about the environment, beginning with "The End of Nature" in 1989, which is regarded as the first book for a general audience on climate change. The group he founded, 350.org, has coordinated 15,000 rallies in 189 countries since 2009. The Boston Globe said in 2010 that he was "probably the country’s most important environmentalist."
Alexis Tsipras, a member of the Hellenic parliament, president of the Synaspismos political party since 2008, head of the SYRIZA parliamentary group since 2009, and leader of the Opposition since June 2012. SYRIZA currently leads in Greek opinion polls. Listen to the audio here.
Between The Lines' Executive Producer Scott Harris hosts a live,
weekly talk show,
Counterpoint, from which some of Between The Lines'
interviews are excerpted. Listen every Monday evening from 8 to 10 p.m.
EDT at www.WPKN.org
(Follows the 5-7 minute White Rose Calendar.)
Counterpoint in its entirety is archived after midnight ET Monday nights, and is available for at least a year following broadcast in WPKN Radio's Archives.
You can also listen to full unedited interview segments from Counterpoint, which are generally available some time the day following broadcast.
Subscribe to Counterpoint bulletins via our subscriptions page.
"GOP senators defend CIA cannibalism program," by Samuel Schmaltz, Dec. 13, 2014
"Demanding Justice for Michael Brown," by Reginald Johnson, Nov. 25, 2014
"Shut Down a Cold War Relic," by Reginald Johnson, Oct. 7, 2014
"U.S. breaking the law? Who cares?" by Reginald Johnson, Sept. 2, 2014
"Warsaw Ghetto 1943 and Occupied Gaza 2014: No Valid Comparison, but Several Haunting Parallels," by Scott Harris, July 31, 2014
"Drifting Towards War?" by Reginald Johnson, May 23, 2014
"Media on Ukraine: What Happened to Journalism?" by Reginald Johnson, May 2, 2014
"Dismantling the Corporate State," by Reginald Johnson, April 8, 2014
"Talking Tough on Russia," by Reginald Johnson, March 20, 2014
"Those Lying Russians," by Reginald Johnson, March 6, 2014
A compilation of activist and news sites with a progressive point of view
If you have other questions regarding subscriptions, feeds or podcasts/mp3s go to our Audio Help page.
Learn how to support our efforts!
Posted Dec. 25, 2013
Excerpt of speech by Hope Metcalf, director of the Arthur Liman Public Interest Program at Yale Law School, recorded and produced by Melinda Tuhus
Prison solitary confinement is considered a form of torture and prohibited under the Geneva Conventions, which the U.S. initiated and has signed onto. Yet, the U.S. has employed various degrees of segregation in prisons, both at Guantanamo Bay and inside America's prison system. The National Religious Campaign Against Torture has taken up this issue, and in mid-December, the Washington, D.C.-based organization held a public forum in New Haven, Conn., presenting an update on the treatment of the prisoners remaining at Guantanamo. Hope Metcalf, another speaker at the event, is director of the Arthur Liman Public Interest Program at Yale University Law School and a lecturer there.
Metcalf has spent years researching the effects of solitary confinement and has visited prisons, spoken with correctional officers, wardens, inmates and their family members to learn more about the practice. In testimony before a U.S. Senate subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights in June 2012, Metcalf and her colleague Judith Resnick, Arthur Liman professor of law, cited the following conclusion made by the United Nations’ Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment in a 2011 report.
The Special Rapporteur stated, “…fifteen days is the maximum period prisoners can spend in solitary confinement without suffering permanent mental harm. Considering the severe mental pain or suffering solitary confinement may cause when used as a punishment … it can amount to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment." Here in an excerpt of Metcalf’s talk in New Haven, she describes her years of working on the issue of solitary confinement – and the conclusions she's drawn about the practice.
HOPE METCALF: I wanted to just take a moment to think about what it is when we talk about solitary confinement. Many times in the media the way it's described is a total sensory deprivation. It's that image of the Count of Monte Cristo. It's what I described to you when I said I left Florence ADX and I'd been in the land of the dead and I'd returned. That does happen, but that total sensory deprivation is in fewer prisons than – that is not the full 80,000 people when we talk about who's in "solitary." It is a horrible, horrible thing but it is relatively rare. However, equally damaging and horrible is something I think might be better termed "total control and total submission." That is to say that you might or might not have a cellmate of your own choosing; you might or might not be able to communicate with the person across the wall. So I've had clients, for example, who have played chess games across the wall, because people are creative and they have urges to be in contact with each other. You might be able to talk through the vent that goes up to the person above you or the sink that the plumbing connects to the sink next to you. People are amazingly creative, including in prison.
Nonetheless, despite the fact that you may be able to communicate a little bit, and despite the fact that you may have access to a radio or books – it's not the total sensory deprivation that we might think – it is nonetheless one of the harshest environments that you could devise for a human being, and it's characterized not so much by its isolation but by its hostility, and by the systematic efforts to break you down and to control every single aspect of your life.
So why does this exist and why is it so pervasive? There is a similar doctrine that lays at the foundation of the Supermax boom of the mid-90s to what we then saw in its most extreme, perverse version post-9/11. And that is what's called in military documents, "learned helplessness." So the point of these interrogations – and they used sensory deprivation – we hear about water-boarding, but one of the most effective means of torture was, in fact, sensory deprivation, because you would render the prisoner totally dependent and you would psychologically debilitate them. And Supermax institutions, likewise, were designed to control every aspect of the prisoner, and in the words of one corrections officer with whom I've spoken, his understanding, what he was taught, was that the purpose of the institution was to break them down. To break them, because they are causing problems, perhaps they've been violent, perhaps they've just been obstreperous, or causing problems in the prison system.
As a prisoner, you're in your cell for every hour of the week except for three times when you get to shower, five times when you're taken out to an exercise cage. You're in the exercise cage by yourself. You may be in the cell by yourself, or with somebody not of your choosing, whom you may fear. You might be terrified and you may very well prefer to be by yourself. All your food, medicine, reading materials, comes through a steel trap at the bottom of the door. You're under constant surveillance. There are checks of your cell every 15 minutes, including at night, when a flashlight will shine in and wake you up. You may experience friendships with other prisoners; you may experience friendships with corrections officers. You may also experience serious harassment by other prisoners or other corrections officers, and you will have nowhere to go, because retreat is not an option, because you are there and you are literally hostage to whomever might be trying to make your life miserable.
So, the very bad news is that institutions shape people, but the very good news is that if we change the institution, we change the people. So my experience in Connecticut, and what we've been able to do in cooperation with the Department (of Correction) and other advocates – not to mention the incredible courage of our clients – I have a few observations. The first is that to make lasting change, we can't wish away the fact that prisons can be dangerous places. We have to acknowledge the very real challenges that corrections officers face in their daily lives, as well as prisoners: prisons must be safe for all who live and work there. So, we need more and less isolating forms of separation, so the idea that people should be separated and treated according to their needs. There may be people who are violent and who are also mentally ill,and they need to be dealt with, but dealt with in a way that actually works.
This segment was recorded and produced by Between The Lines' Melinda Tuhus.