United National Antiwar Coalition (UNAC) Conference, Stamford, CT March 25, 2012 Selected audio from plenary sessions and panel discussions
Please note that this site is best viewed through Internet Explorer 8, Firefox 3.0, Safari 1.0, Google Chrome, Opera 6.0 or Netscape 6.0, or later. Please send any comments via our Contact form.
Please select the "Current Broadcast MP3" item under the "For Stations" button in the Navigation Bar.
Between The Lines' Executive Producer Scott Harris hosts a live,
weekly talk show, "Counterpoint" from which some of Between The Lines'
interviews are excerpted. Listen every Monday evening from 8 to 10 p.m.
EDT at www.WPKN.org
(Follows the 5-7 minute White Rose Calendar.)
Counterpoint is archived in its entirety on
WPKN Radio's Archives after midnight ET Monday nights.
Subscribe to Counterpoint via email.
"Updates on NDAA and Other Civil Liberty Erosions: Judge Orders Preliminary Injunction to Block NDAA Detention Provision," by Anna Manzo, May 17, 2012
"Angry and Fighting Back," by Reginald Johnson, May 17, 2012
"Lessons on Corporate Media's Role in Promoting U.S. War: Next Target Iran," by Scott Harris, April 30, 2012
"One Blue Sky Above Us": 40,000 Norwegians Respond to Breivik's Hate with Love for Children of the Rainbow," by Anna Manzo, April 27, 2012
UPDATED: "Part III: What the Trayvon Martin Case Reveals about Stand Your Ground and Concealed Weapons Laws," by Anna Manzo, April 13, 2012
MP3: Nathan Schneider (www.wagingnonviolence.org) has been reporting on the OWS movement from its first days in August, 2011. In this April 3, 2012 interview, Richard Hill asks him to assess the on-going debate in the movement between those espousing a strict adherence to non-violence principles and practices and those advocating a 'diversity of tactics', Interview conducted by Richard Hill, WPKN
A compilation of activist and news sites with a progressive point of view
Podcasts: direct or via iTunes
Subscribe to Program Summaries, Interview Transcripts or Counterpoint via email or RSS feed
If you have other questions regarding subscriptions, feeds or podcasts/mp3s go to our Audio Help page.
Learn how to support our efforts!
Posted May 11, 2011
Interview with Gabor Rona, international legal director with Human Rights First, conducted by Scott Harris
It wasn’t long after President Obama’s May 1 announcement that a U.S. Navy Seal commando team had killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, that former members of the Bush administration and their allies began celebrating the role they claimed U.S. torture of terrorist suspects had played in locating the al Qaeda leader. Former Vice President Dick Cheney said that waterboarding -- which was banned by President Obama in January 2009 -- was “a good program. It was a legal program. It was not torture, I would strongly recommend we continue it." Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld stated “it was a mistake to rule out waterboarding. It's clear that those techniques that the CIA used worked."
The motivation of former members of the Bush administration for defending torture is transparent, as their actions are considered war crimes under international law and as individuals, certain Bush officials could be subject to prosecution when they travel abroad. But apart from the legal issues, most interrogation experts agree that the only effective method of extracting reliable information from detainees is to use non-coercive methods and to build trust with suspects. Gen. David Petraeus, who commands U.S. forces in Afghanistan and has been selected by President Obama to head the CIA, has asserted many times that U.S. torture serves as a major terrorist recruiting tool.
Between The Lines’ Scott Harris spoke with Gabor Rona, international legal director with Human Rights First, who explains why he rejects claims that torture is an effective interrogation method and believes that the abuse of terrorist suspects hindered efforts in locating Osama bin Laden.
Find more information on human rights group’s views on torture at www.humanrightsfirst.org/.
Related Links: